• Home
• About

News Feed

One big happy bastard Muslim family

April 29, 2007 by Joe 

A few days back I came across the Saudi Arabian camel beauty pageant story and so wanted to blog about it, I had a few good one-liners ready, but by the time I got around to it sure enough, I was beaten to it. Independent Sources is a good source for stories like that one.

Today, thanks to Atlas Shrugs I came across another story emanating from Saudi Arabia — this one however is not a funny story. It’s a sick and disturbing one. While it is actually a few months old, I just absolutely felt the need to blog about it.

According to an article over at the website of Arab News, the Middle East’s Leading English Language Daily, two business partners, both of whom are in their seventies, have each married the other’s teenage daughter.

When asked if they have consulted with their daughters before this arraingement was made, Al-Qahtani, one of the dirty old bastards in question replied:

I did not ask my daughter. I don’t have to. I know what is beneficial for her. When I told her what I had planned, she was happy. If she hadn’t been, she would have told her mother.

Al-Dossary, dirty old bastard no. 2 had this to say:

In bedouin culture, a girl does not have the right to express her opinion about marriage, especially if her father and brothers have decided on a particular man. In both our cases, we have been married for a long time and have had no problems with our wives. Although we are much older than our wives, the fact that we are together proves that we are right for each other.

Yeah sure it does, because you guys are together proves that you are “right for each other,” either that or it just proves that the poor girls are just terrified for their lives having been brought up in a twisted and sick culture that subjugates them as nothing more then mere property. I’m sure you two believe that marrying each other’s teenage daughters is a very proper and normal thing to do. Thank God I live in the good old United States of America, where we have words for people like you — sick, disgusting, dirty old scum bags.

When asked if they would ever use this strategy in finding their young prey again, dirty old bastard no. 1 answered:

I cannot marry again as I already have four wives, but no one knows what will happen in the future.

Yeah you might get down to only 3 again if you have to kill one of them for speaking her mind or something.

However, if I were to remarry, I would marry one of my cousins and would have no problem in offering one of my daughters in return.

Of course to this question dirty old bastard no. 2 had to give his two cents:

I am satisfied with my three wives but as Al-Qahtani said, no one knows the future. If I am to marry and the father of the girl or her brother asks me to give him one of my daughters, then I would agree. I would even agree if he asked for one of my granddaughters.

Hell your already your own daughter’s brother-in-law, you might as well throw the grandkids in the mix too.

When visiting the Middle East and wearing Muslim head coverings while probably violating the Logan Act, Nancy Pelosi; mother, grandmother, wife and “woman’s rights” activist — of course, has nothing to say. Nor does any one else in the so-called “Progressive” left.

White Flag Harry

April 29, 2007 by Joe 

Harry Reid is a scumbag. He is a disgusting rat of a man, whose biggest fear is that the brave men and woman of our Armed Forced will complete their mission — and thus end everything that the far left wing of the Democratic party has been hoping to accomplish. He is so fearful of the knowledge that if given the resources that they need to accomplish their mission the brave men & woman of our military will do so, that he has made his one and only goal as a Senator to ensure that we pull out of Iraq with our tail between our legs.

He continues to parrot his “the war is lost,” “the war is lost” mantra and has gone on record to say that even if General Petraeus were to come to Capitol Hill and give proof that the surge is working — he would not believe him.

BASH: You talked several times about General Petraeus. You know that he is here in town. He was at the White House today, sitting with the president in the Oval Office and the president said that he wants to make it clear that Washington should not be telling him, General Petraeus, a commander on the ground in Iraq, what to do, particularly, the president was talking about Democrats in Congress.

He also said that General Petraeus is going to come to the Hill and make it clear to you that there is progress going on in Iraq, that the so-called surge is working. Will you believe him when he says that?

REID: No, I don’t believe him, because it’s not happening.

This should come as no surprise however from a man who doesn’t care for America and certainly doesn’t care for the constituents in Nevada whom he serves. Reid himself confirmed this as so when he was asked by PBS’s Jim Lehrer to define “success” in his job.

JIM LEHRER: So you’re going to define your job or define success in your job is in stopping the president from doing things rather than enacting things that you think should be enacted?

SEN. HARRY REID: Of course, that’s one of the things that I think is successful…

Sen. Reid does not care about doing his job, all he cares about is to help spread the plague that is the so-called “progressive” movement by any means necessary. Right now the biggest obstacle to the lunatic left fringe of the Democratic party’s plan for a “progressive” utopia is victory in Iraq.

While I don’t particularly like the label “war on terror, ” for a number of reasons, the main thing being that it does not put the struggle that the freedom loving western world is facing into proper perspective, I prefer “war against Islamofascism”, but the bottom line none-the-less is that we ARE in a war, a war unlike any of which civilization has ever seen — a war to protect our way of life. However, the so-called “progressives” are so jaded that some of them even refuse to admit that there even is such a thing as this “war on terror.”

There is one thing and one thing only driving White Flag Harry and the rest of the lunatic fringe that has taken over the DNC — and it is not patriotism or concern about our soldiers or our country, it’s politics. White Flag Harry, once again with his own words, confirmed this as such when he said:

We’re going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.

While I am not a big John McCain supporter, at least I know where his heart lies — with America and not with partisan politics as he recently pronounced:

For my part, I would rather lose a campaign than a war, I understand the frustration caused by our mistakes in this war. I sympathize with the fatigue of the American people . . . But I also know the toll a lost war takes on an army and a country.

I have always considered myself more of a Libertarian and then in recent years an “Independent Conservative” but except for a few exceptions, I only find the sane voices in the Republican party. America be damned, the lunatic left wants nothing more then to bail out and lose this war so that they could solidify their political clout, and somewhere in a cave at the Afghanistan/Pakistan border a madman smiles…

Fight For Me

April 29, 2007 by Joe 

Hat Tip to Jarhead John.

Gianna Jessen: Abortion Survivor

April 21, 2007 by Joe 

This past Wednesday the Supreme Court voted to uphold the ban on partial birth abortions, marking, as I commented on another blogger’s post, a great victory for Babies rights. Partial birth abortion is a disgusting, vile practice and any decent human being even those her are pro “abortion rights” should agree on that.

Today, I discovered an article in the UK’s Daily Mail about a British study that found that 1 in 30 babies that were aborted for medical reasons were in fact born alive.

They lived for an average of 80 minutes - although in some cases foetuses survived for over six hours.

Most of the babies were born between 20 and 24 weeks of pregnancy, but some had been in the womb for as little as 17 weeks.

The figures, based on a study of West Midlands hospitals, has reignited the abortion debate, with pro-life campaigners demanding the time limit for terminations be cut.

Researchers looked at the outcome of 3,189 abortions performed on seriously handicapped foetuses at 20 hospitals between 1995 and 2004.

It showed that 102 - or around one in 30 - aborted for reasons such as Down’s Syndrome and heart defects, were born alive.

Abortions are allowed to be carried out if the pregnancy is shown to have an adverse effect on the mental health and wellbeing of the mother up until the 24th week of pregnancy.

Beyond this point, the procedure is only sanctioned if the baby has a severe disability or if the mother’s life is at risk.

The latest study, carried out by experts from the West Midlands Perinatal Institute and published in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, showed that three per cent of aborted disabled babies were born alive.

While there is no suggestion that any of the babies documented in the West Midlands study lived for more than a few hours, doctors in Norwich are currently treating a toddler born at 24 weeks after three botched terminations.

He was born three years ago and is still alive.

Campaigners said it was likely the Midlands figures were just the tip of the iceberg as the region only accounts for around a tenth of the babies born in the country each year.

In addition, the study only looked at babies whose lives were ended because of disability.

However, most abortions are carried out on ‘healthy’ babies for social reasons. Julia Millington of the pro-life group Alive and Kicking said: “This can’t just be happening in the West Midlands.

“It begs the question of how many healthy babies must be surviving? It would suggest the true figure must be much higher.

This study was based in a region of the UK that only accounts for 1/10th of the babies born in that nation per year. Just imagine what the true numbers would be if it were a survey of the rest of the United Kingdom, or even the entire Western World.

The article ended by discussing the story of Gianna Jessen, who celebrated her 30th birthday earlier this month, despite the fact that she should be dead.

When Gianna’s biological mother was seven and a half months pregnant, she went to a Los Angeles abortion clinic to have her pregnancy terminated. The baby growing inside her body would have other plans, however. The abortion failed, and despite the fact of being trapped in a acid bath from the saline solution injected into her mother’s womb, Gianna Jessen was born into the world — alive and premature, with severe damage that resulted in physical atrophy and cerebral palsy.

Gianna Jessen has not let the fact that her biological mother’s attempt to murder her before she was born has left her stricken with cerebral palsy hold her back.

From Gianna Jessen’s Biography:

Gianna Jessen does not quit. Giving up is not an option to her. Gianna has what she refers to as the “gift” of Cerebral Palsy. She weighed a mere 2 lbs at birth and the doctors said she would never be able to hold up her head, sit up, crawl or walk. She began to walk by the age of three years old with the help of leg braces and a walker.

Gianna doesn’t believe that her Cerebral Palsy takes away her life, but, rather, enriches it. . . she walks with a slight limp today and runs marathons. On April 30, 2005 she completed her first 26.2 mile marathon after running just over 7 hours and was presented with the coveted blank blank award! On April 23, 2006 she completed the London Marathon as well. She is now determined to run marathons all over the place, because she was never supposed to even walk!

Gianna understands the plight of orphans, being one herself. She was placed into the foster care system early on in life, eventually being taken into the loving home of a woman named Penny. Penny has been a mother to 56 foster children in her life. Gianna was later adopted by Penny’s daughter, making Penny Gianna’s grandmother. According to Gianna, Penny saved her life.

Gianna is a Christian. Her life was given to her by the grace of God. She shouldn’t be walking, but more miraculous still; she should not even be alive. Gianna’s biological mother was 17 when she had a saline abortion in her third trimester. Many Americans don’t realize it is legal to have an abortion throughout all nine months of pregnancy. After being burned alive for approximately 18 hours in the womb from the saline solution, Gianna was delivered alive in a Los Angeles County abortion clinic. Her medical records state, “born during saline abortion”…this is what caused her Cerebral Palsy.

I’ll close with a quote from Miss Jessen, from the Daily Mail Article.

“If abortion is about women’s rights, then what were my rights?

“No decision is solely yours to make. All decisions affect another human being - whether it is for good or for ill.

“If people are going to talk about abortion, then it’s important for them to know that these babies can be born alive and survive.”

Don’t Mess With Miss America

April 21, 2007 by Joe 

Venus Ramsey, 82, the first Miss America to be photographed in color, the first Miss America with Red Hair as well as the first Miss America to run for political office achieved another first recently. She became the first pistol packing Miss America.

According to the Associated Press and Yahoo, Mrs. Ramsey, who won the Miss America pageant in 1944, confronted a man on her farm in south-central Kentucky last week after she saw her dog run into a storage building where thieves had previously made off with old farm equipment.

Ramey said the man told her he would leave. “I said, ‘Oh, no you won’t,’ and I shot their tires so they couldn’t leave,” Ramey said.

She had to balance on her walker as she pulled out a snub-nosed .38-caliber handgun.

“I didn’t even think twice. I just went and did it,” she said. “If they’d even dared come close to me, they’d be 6 feet under by now.”

Venus Ramsey, whose picture was adorned on a B-17 fighter plane, which made 68 sorties over war-torn Germany and never lost a man, is one tough cookie.

Check out her bio at the Miss America website.

Defending “My World”

April 20, 2007 by Joe 

My blog covers a very, very small portion of the photosphere and I don’t really get very much attention. That’s all right because I use it mainly as a place just to get my ideas out in writing, even though the great majority of my posts are usually short commentaries to news stories.

I don’t get very many comments, except for a few occasions like my post after Rosie’s 9/11 conspiracy rant on The View. I enjoy all the ones I get, I especially get a kick out of the tinfoil hat nut jobs. I had one commenter who recently irked me a little bit, by just leaving little jabs and left hooks with little anti-conservative attacks, while avoiding uppercuts by failing to provide any substantial counter-arguments.

I decide to give my recent reply it’s own post. So here it is…

————————

You know the “WE” I was referring to was America and not us “Neo-Cons,” though I think you probably knew that and just wanted to take this chance to come pick on me here at my blog. It’s funny that you choose to do it on a posting about one of the many disgusting facets of the radicalized version of Islam. But then again, that is what liberals do — stick up for the bad guys, because heaven forbid they stick up for traditional American values.

What I really take offense to is label that you have given to me of a “neo-conservative.” However, I know that is just part of the James Carville playbook for attacking the political right in this country, much like Conservatives use the word “Liberal” to attack the political left. I find your bestowing of me with the “Neo-Con” tag a great insult, mainly because it implies that I was once a liberal — and that is a very disturbing thought.

However, I do understand that for the past few years now the term has become part of the Carville / Howard Dean / main-stream media methods for disparaging those who believe in aggressive methods for tackling the problem of radicalized Islamofascism and the tactics of terrorism that it breeds. Though, while I do believe that you seem educated enough to know what the true meaning of a “neo-conservative” is, I understand your usage of the term as a way to disparage myself and my “hateful” conservative views.

I do however; feel the need to offer up a brief primer on what a “neo-conservative” is, or at least what one used to be.

Neo-conservatism has its roots in the 30’s & 40’s with the migration of (mostly Jewish) European Social Democrats to the U.S. Neo-(or “new”) conservatives, are those who are new to the conservative movement. They have slowly migrated to the right of the political spectrum, on certain issues, while maintaining one foot firmly in their roots towards the left side of the spectrum.

The first major rise in “neo-conservatism” came in the 70’s when social democrats who were opposed to the Soviet Union, following their split with Stalinism in the 1950’s, began to slowly shift to the right in certain matters, particularly those of foreign policy. They were socialist Democrats who still held a passion for social Democracy, but began to distance them selves from their leftist brethren allying themselves with the Nixon administration over foreign policy, especially by their support for the Vietnam War and opposition to the Soviet Union.

The second wave of “neo-conservatism” came following their “lost” years during the 1990’s after they lost their purpose due to the collapse of the Soviet Empire. Following 9/11, they rallied in support of the Bush doctrine. Men like Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman and Christopher Hitchens, former columnist for The Nation (a publication, I’m sure that, a devout leftist such as yourself probably reads), are much, much more suitable for the tag of “neo-conservatives” then myself and the bloggers like me you seem to enjoy attacking.

Now however, as I mentioned earlier, the term is nothing more then a dirty word used by the so-called “Progressives” to attack anyone on the political right.

You say that you have been popping into my blog for a while now, I find it interesting that you choose to comment for the first time on a post of mine blasting Rosie O’Donnell, or a post such as this one which broadcasts the lunacy that is radical Islam and only offer up short little zingers and jabs attacking some of my off-hand comments, instead of offering up any sort of counter-arguments or alternative viewpoints.

But then again, that is all that Liberals and particularly the Democratic Party has become today, a group that resorts to all sorts of attacks in their unfortunate successful attempt to re-take congress and their ongoing attempts to regain the White House — without offering up any sort of substantial plan or new ideas.

As I wrote last month, in my piece on the “modern Liberal mind”:

Modern Liberalism by its very nature is the exact opposite of progress. The Liberal left wing in America is completely void of any new ideas or fresh approaches to reforming our schools, our communities, our national security, every single institution that their failed policies have broken in the last few decades as well as helping the lower class and minorities that they claim to be looking out for.

Liberal Democrats have absolutely nothing new to talk about, they have no fresh ideas. All they have done is repackage their same old soft-socialism beliefs and are now selling it off as the “Progressive” movement.

Progressives, modern Liberals or whatever you want to call them — will always champion evil over good, wrong over right and failure over success. What they champion, as “social issues” are nothing more then “socialist causes.”

You claim that my enemy is not “terrorism” but is in fact “political diversity.” Once again, “Doc” I’m sorry but you are wrong. No, my enemies are not “political diversity,” they are anything and anyone that poses a threat to this great country in which we live and anything that poses a threat to the American way of life. So, in addition to Islamofascists who use terrorism to further their views, my enemies include those so-called “Progressives” who are slowly eating away at America and her institutions under the false guise of “political diversity.”

Yes, my enemies are not just the Islamofascists, but they are also the enemy within — the Rosie O’Donnells, Barbara Streisands, Hillary Clintons, Nancy Pelosis, Michael Moore’s and everyone else who shares their twisted ideologies.

I will continue to ring the warning bell against the so-called “Progressive” left, who claim to be the champions for the cause of the betterment the society, but spend more time hating anybody or anything that holds dear traditional American values and  everyone who is not aligned with the socialist viewpoints — and less time helping the “little guy” that they claim to be looking out for, until the day comes when the dominate viewpoint in this country returns to being those that have made America the greatest country on God’s green earth.

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Partial-Birth Abortion

April 19, 2007 by Joe 

During one of the darkest weeks our nation has faced in the past few years, one shining beacon of hope was announced on Wednesday as the Supreme Court upheld the 2003 ban on partial-birth abortions. Thankfully, the appointments of Roberts and Alito may have very well been what helped to uphold the ban on one of the most disgusting and vile practices imaginable.

Predictably, Liberals are outraged over this. Hillary Clinton had this to say:

This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman’s right to choose and recognized the importance of women’s health. Today’s decision blatantly defies the Court’s recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.

But who should be surprised that the Looney left and its queen would be appalled by a judgment banning something that is nothing other then a form on infanticide. In case you are unsure of what the barbaric ritual of partial-birth abortion exactly is, click on over to Let Freedom Reign, where a detailed graphic is provided. Be forewarned though, that it is very graphic and disgusting, but something that I believe that anybody who thinks that this sort of barbaric acts should be a “fundamental right” absolutely needs to see.

Predictably, that disgusting fish wrap, the New York Times publishes a piece that calls it a “procedure“. Here is the link to the article, I’ve run the first few paragraphs through the bullshit filter below.

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Abortion Procedure

WASHINGTON, April 18 — The Supreme Court narrowly upheld a federal law today banning a controversial abortion procedure a disgusting practice, giving the anti-abortion movement one of its biggest legal victories in years.

The justices ruled, 5 to 4, that a law passed by Congress in 2003 and signed by President Bush does not violate the Constitution by imposing an undue burden on a woman’s right to end a pregnancy protecting the right of an unborn child to be born into the world. The majority said its ruling reflects the government’s “legitimate, substantial interest in preserving and promoting fetal life.”

“The act, on its face, is not void for vagueness and does not impose an undue burden from any overbreadth,” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the court, rejecting key arguments of the law’s opponents.

The majority upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, whose very name can set off heated debate. The procedure disgusting ritual addressed is known medically as “intact dilation and evacuation” or “D and X,” short for dilation and extraction. It involves partly removing an intact fetus, then destroying the skull to complete the abortion.

Doctors and other abortion-rights advocates who challenged the law maintained that the procedure disgusting ritual is often the safest to use late in the pregnancy, because it minimizes the chances of injury to the uterus used to allow for an abortion very late into a pregnancy, because it is performed by caving in the baby‘s skull and sucking out his or hers brain.

The court majority said that the 2003 law would not affect most abortions, which are performed early in a pregnancy; that the law does not encourage “arbitrary or discriminatory enforcement,” and that alternatives to the prohibited procedure disgusting ritual are available. Justice Kennedy was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr.

Critics of the law had attacked it in part because it does not provide for a broad exception to protect the health of the woman because they feel that it should be perfectly legal to end the life of an unborn baby at anytime. It does, however, provide for an exception to save a woman’s life. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called the majority decision “alarming” and a retreat from the court’s earlier holdings. “It tolerates, indeed applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,” Justice Ginsburg wrote, in a dissent joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter and Stephen G. Breyer.

Filed under: General, Politics
Tagged: Liberal Looney Bin

Iranian Serial Killers Acquitted

April 15, 2007 by Joe 

Oh, them wacky Islamofascists are at it again. According to a BBC report, the Iranian Supreme Court has acquitted a group of men who committed a series of brutal murders during 2002.

The vigilantes were not guilty because their victims were involved in un-Islamic activities, the court found.

The killers said they believed Islam let them spill the blood of anyone engaged in illicit activities if they issued two warnings to the victims.

The serial killings took place in 2002 in the south-eastern city of Kerman.

‘Morally corrupt’

The case raises serious questions about vigilantes in Iran taking justice into their own hands and undermining the rule of law.

Up to 18 people were killed in just one year, but only five of the murders were tried in court.

According to their confessions, the killers put some of their victims in pits and stoned them to death. Others were suffocated. One man was even buried alive while others had their bodies dumped in the desert to be eaten by wild animals.

The accused, who were all members of an Islamic paramilitary force, told the court their understanding of the teachings of one Islamic cleric allowed them to kill immoral people if they had ignored two warnings to stop their bad behaviour.

But there was no judicial process to determine the guilt of the victims in these cases.

The group even killed a young couple they thought were involved in sex outside marriage, but media reports say the couple were either married or engaged to be married.

Look at that Sharia, the same rule of law these lunatics want the whole world to be ruled by, allows for the vigilante murder of people they deem “morally corrupt“. Meanwhile, the lunatic left in this country continues to think that WE are the problem.

Filed under: Uncategorized
Tagged: Religion of Peace

It’s a Conspiracy!

April 15, 2007 by Joe 

Well the tinfoil hat nut job brigade all across America are creaming their collective pants, thanks to that great source of “Truth” Russia’s Pravda.

Apparently the whole Don Imus-Rutgers Woman’s basketball team issue, was a government conspiracy designed to silence the “powerful media figure,” who was going to expose the “truth” behind the 9/11 “conspiracy.

Also according to Pravda, Rosie O’Donnell has expressed concern that U.S. military leaders could actually imprison Mr. Imus. Sorcha Faal, the author of the hard core journalistic piece, went on to state that it is expected that the aftereffects of the U.S. war leaders on Imus, will have chilling effects on other American media personalities, particularly Charlie Sheen.

Unable to attack such a powerful media figure as Don Imus, directly, the US War Leaders, and as we have seen many times before, resorted to a massive media attack against him using as the reason a racial slur against a US woman’s basketball team, but which has been pointed out by other media outlets was not by any means a rare occurrence for the legendary radio icon to make.

But, to the US War Leaders, Don Imus represented the most serious threat, to date, of the growing assault against them by America’s media personalities threatening to expose the truths behind the events of September 11, 2001 and the Iraq/Afghanistan Wars.

I guess Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson must actually be covert operators working for Karl Rove and Dick Cheney and were just following orders of the U.S. war leaders.

Filed under: WTF?
Tagged:

Another Brutal attack on a Muslim Woman, by Muslim Men

April 15, 2007 by Joe 

I’m sure the woman’s rights activists are going to be all over this one… [Insert sound of crickets chirping here].

The “Religion Of Peace” is at it again, This time in Norway. Norwegian-Somalian Kadra, who became famous in Norway for exposing imam support of female circumcision, was beaten unconscious on Thursday.

Kadra, became famous in her adopted country of Norway in the Fall of 2000, following a Television documentary that exposed the barbaric Muslim practice of female genital mutilation.

A good portion of that documentary followed Kadra, then 20 years old, as she hid from her parents, whom wanted to take her as well as her two younger sisters to Djibouti to carry out the disgusting ritual. Female genitalia mutilation, is usually performed during “vacations” to Africa, particularly in Djibouti. The sick procedure includes the total removal of the exterior female genitalia and then the subsequent stitching together — which leads to lifelong health problems and the mortality due to implications is high.

Now seven years later, following a separate incident where she expressed that the Koran’s views on women need to be re-interpreted, she was severly beeten by a group of Muslim men.

Kadra was attacked and beaten senseless by seven or eight persons of Somali origin, newspaper VG reports.

“I was terrified. While I lay on the pavement they kicked me and screamed that I had trampled on the Koran. Several shouted Allah-o-akbar (God is great) and also recited from the Koran,” Kadra told VG.

Kadra linked the attack to recent remarks in VG where she said that the Koran’s views on women needed to be reinterpreted.

Kadra said that the gang of Somali men attacked her around 3 a.m. in downtown Oslo on Thursday. A medical examination found that she had several broken ribs, NRK (Norwegian Broadcasting) reports. Kadra filed charges and was due to speak with police on Friday.

Hat tip to Atlas Shrugs.

Filed under: Uncategorized
Tagged: Religion of Peace

Comments